Constitution in its general sense refers to a framework of principles and laws that determine the nature of governance as well as the interaction between the state and the people. Consequently, various countries implement various types of constitutions depending on their political, social, and historical contexts. Broadly, constitutions can be categorized into six types. Every type of constitution has its strengths and weaknesses, which determine the manner in which a state is run. Let us focus on the 6 types of constitution separately and in details.
1. Written Constitution
A written constitution on the other hand, is a legal document that is clearly written to outline the basic laws within a country. They are, in fact, written and incorporated in a single document or sometimes in a chain of documents of law.
Advantages
i. Clarity and Precision: Given that all the fundamental laws are articulated in one document, there is limited room for uncertainty. It serves the purpose of creating checks and balances between the government and the governed so that the two know their limits in terms of powers and liberties.
ii. Legal Reference: The content of written constitutions
is used as a frame of reference by the courts, legislators and the public. This
assists in the protection of individuals rights and guarantees that any
infringement on those rights can be contested.
iii. Stability: The written constitution gives some form
of stability when it comes to the government and one cannot been changed easily
by the government.
iv. Protection of Rights: It provides a good check and
balance for the protection of citizens since rights cannot be violated since
they are clearly enumerated.
Disadvantages
i. Inflexibility: It is also important to observe that written constitutions are often rigid and may be hard to revise depending on the political or social transformations in a given country.
ii. Judicial Overreach: This gives the courts
jurisdiction over the interpretation of the constitution and while doing so may
lead to judicial activism or legislating through the court by making decisions
that should be made by the lawmakers.
iii. Slow to Adapt: There might be changes in the
societal needs, technologies or in the economic fields and that might
necessitate review of the constitution. However, the process of amendment is
usually much slower and bureaucratic.
2. Unwritten Constitution
This type of constitution does not rely on a single written document but is grounded on the beliefs of the country, customary practices, court decisions, and acts of parliament. The United Kingdom is the best example of an ‘unwritten’ constitution country.
Advantages
i. Flexibility: Since unwritten constitutions do not go through a rigorous process of being written and enacted, it becomes easier for them to evolve with changing circumstances and societal transformation.
ii. Evolutionary Nature: Through the operation of the
principles of the unwritten constitution, the legal system develops gradually
over time and adapts to changes in the attitudes of the society and political
procedures.
iii. Room for Interpretation: This aspect makes it easier
for the constitution to incorporate new legal and social realities as it is
more of an interpretative constitution.
Disadvantages
i. Uncertainty: This, therefore, means that without a formal constitution, it is possible for there to be misunderstanding or vagueness as to the rights of the people and the authority of the state.
ii. Potential for Abuse: However, defining limited rule
of law may lead the government to overstep or abuse its authority since the
roles and duties are not sharply demarcated.
iii. Instability: Although these traditions are generally
good for an unwritten system of government, the fact that they can easily be
changed also implies that the government can become unstable due to changes in
the traditions and practices.
3. Rigid Constitution
In a rigid system of government, amendments or change in the constitution are very hard; in some instances, it must undergo a special and complicated process unlike the normal legislative processes. Constitution of this type is usually incorporated with the aim of protecting the foundational ethic and political culture of the given country.
Advantages
i. Stability and Protection of Fundamental Rights: The impossibility of making easy and sudden changes in the Constitution protects fundamental rights in a better way as well as encourages a stable political framework in the country.
ii. Safeguard Against Arbitrary Changes: Constitutions
cannot be easily changed by governments to suit their needs, which provide for
strong legal and political stability.
Disadvantages
i. Inflexibility: Since changes to the system are hard to come by, the constitution is not usually responsive to modern changes and challenges, which often result in inefficient laws that no longer benefit the nation.
ii. Potential for Crisis: The implementation of a rigid system
of government when there are numerous societal transformations tends to cause a
constitutional crisis because the legal system cannot meet the contemporary
demands.
iii. Limited Legislative Power: There is a possibility
that legislators themselves will be unable to solve some of these problems due
to the limitations imposed by the system of government.
4. Flexible Constitution
A flexible system is one that can be altered or modified in the same manner in which other laws are enacted. This makes it responsive to new social, economical and political developments.
Advantages
i. Ease of Amendment: It is easier to modify a flexible system of government to meet the dynamic needs of society, new technologies, and other factors.
ii. Responsive to Change: It enables the government to
balance this through various means and make the required adjustment promptly
should a crisis emerge or an emergency occurs or if the public opinion swings.
iii. Dynamic Governance: Open constitutions reflect the
ever-changing nature of governance, and as a result, are more suitable to
current realities.
Disadvantages
i. Vulnerability to Abuse: Because a flexible system can be easily amended, it always comes under threat of being changed for political expediency by governments or political parties that wish to bend the rules in their favor.
ii. Potential for Instability: Sweeping changes or
amendments could further endanger legal and political stability and bring about
conditions that are highly unpredictable.
iii. Weak Protection of Rights: It is argued that in
countries with flexible constitutions, fundamental rights do not receive
adequate protection since the constitutions can be easily amended or set aside
by the legislative process.
5. Federal Constitution
A federal system of government distributes authority between a central (federal) government and several sub-central (state/provincial) governments containing specific self-governing powers.
Advantages
i. Decentralization of Power: Federalism permits the regional authorities to take decisions that would address the needs and circumstances of the populaces under them leading to efficient government.
ii. Checks and Balances: When the powers are divided
amongst the various levels of government then none of them can be a determining
force, hence leading to democracy.
iii. Cultural Autonomy: Federal constitutions are
employed in multicultural and multi-juridical societies, as it enables various
districts or communities to preserve their specific cultural, legal, and social
structures.
Disadvantages
i. Complexity of Governance: Working with different levels of government can also lead to bureaucracy and non-efficiency, because the cooperation between federal and regional level can be slow.
ii. Inequality Between Regions: Inequality and tension
can easily occur in a federal system because of disparities in resource
mobilization and development between the regions.
iii. Conflict of Laws: This is because a conflict between
the federal and state laws can create confusion or conflict which makes the
legal system more complicated.
6. Unitary Constitution
A unitary system basically means that the country has a unitary system of government where powers are vested in the central authority with very little or no delegation to the regions.
Advantages
i. Efficiency in Governance: A unitary system is usually easier to manage because everything is controlled from the central administrative base and policies within countries are consistent.
ii. Strong Central Authority: This results in coordinated
implementation of policies and clear leadership especially during emergencies.
iii. Equality Across Regions: We note that there are no
substantial differences in laws and available resources between regions because
all are subordinate to a central power.
Disadvantages
i. Lack of Regional Autonomy: The issue that is not addressed in the cities and towns of regions, self-governing or autonomous, can result in dissatisfaction when people have different cultural, social or economical demands.
ii. Overburdened Central Government: Due to its many
responsibilities, the central authority might be overwhelmed with the
responsibility of overseeing an entire nation and this might lead to
inefficiencies or delays.
iii. Potential for Authoritarianism: Obviously, the idea
of concentrating power in a single center may result in the formation of an
authoritarian regime if the system of checks and balances is inadequately
provided.
Conclusion
The 6 types of constitution has its scale of benefits and
drawbacks depending on the model of governance, history, and the necessities of
the society. For effective governance, there is a need to apply both structures
and processes that are standardized and those that allow plenty of discretion.
Knowledge of the various strengths and weaknesses of each type assists in
defining better structures for the effective expansion of governance in the
future.
If you wish to contribute to our blog, please email us on wispaztechnologies@gmail.com.
Leave a Comment